A few months ago, I began viewing AI imagery as fine art. Yet, I’m not sure if it’s that.
Analysis of the proposition to prepare computer intelligence for Facebook and Instagram posts
Intelligence: The capacity to gather and apply information and abilities.
If Meta scrapes Facebook and Instagram accounts for training AI models, isn’t that alarming? Those outpourings of people’s lives are the impetus for Meta’s AI, becoming alarming, for Mark Zuckerberg, with his faith in open source AI, has become yet another hero of technological change (to be honest, if he weren’t already great).
Why would anyone want AI trained on Facebook and Instagram accounts, with all their forms for human experience, their amoral attitude toward young users of their platforms, their ill-advised influencers, their criminal element and the recognition that OpenAI is not nearly as fool with how ChatGPT-4o will behave and how ChatGPT-3.5 behaves?
To me, it doesn’t seem like a great strategy. Regarding social media, Facebook might be the most popular, but not the most insightful.
Social media: Computerized media that permit individuals to interface with one another (frequently namelessly) and to share data. Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and WhatsApp.
Data: Computerized data (the type put away by PCs) normally consists of numerical information encoded as zeros and ones in double coding.
This approach is completely ridiculous. It seems rather impractical, to put a burden on the users of Facebook and Instagram in any shape, for anything based on artificial intelligence. Why train an AI on information filtered through the vagaries of what is a human experience (social media)?
Having the resources to train LLMs does not mean that it should be done recklessly. Reddit and Microsoft are both allies of OpenAI, which I suspect will come out on top if we do achieve AGI, but danger should not be discounted.
Curator of AI + Art at the ETH Zurich AI Center, Adrian Christopher Notz, is the individual who most convinced me that AI imagery could become fine art and that AI video could become cinema. “Without photography, neither Van Gogh nor Picasso would have taught us to see the world in new ways,” he thinks.
I continue to feel reluctant to put money into the hands of AI firms, even the best-known, although from time to time a little of that is necessary.
Film director Harmony Korine, whose current film Aggro Dr1ft uses, I have read, frequent scenes that employ AI-enhanced cinematography, is certainly a reputable and notable filmmaker, yet has not shirked from the new interest in AI.
Figures like Notz and Korine, in the fields of fine art and film, seem to have no problem at all enjoying AI applications when it comes to their craft.
I am just not sure Mark Zuckerberg will have the same positive net benefit if Meta becomes the top player in AI.
I have read that if Apple plays it hand slyly, it will steal the thunder of both Meta and OpenAI, but an email three weeks ago from Poe, who I found with Quora, let me know that ChatGPT-4o is available.
It is said that ChatGPT-4o will change the shape of computing. The workforce may change as well. So would film and fine art, potentially. Fashion may as well.
The first worldwide Miss AI contest is being judged this month. It has likewise occurred to me whether a symbiotic AI friend might attract the kind of dialogue I would be interested in reading.
I see myself as a writer, although I haven’t written anything in the way of fiction since November.
Reading a dialogue between an AI character and a person who finds that appealing might spark a truly forward-thinking dialogue.
Quora is another platform that invites the kind of discussion I might find interesting in reading. It both interests other users in a question posed and it presents an answer as devised by Poe, if you’re interested. You’re welcome to leave a link, to follow, and to comment.
Patrick